Somnophilia and Sleep-Related Fantasies

Human sexuality encompasses a wide spectrum of desires and fantasies, some of which remain shrouded in mystery and taboo. Somnophilia, a lesser-known sexual interest, has gained attention in recent years due to its complex nature and ethical implications. This phenomenon involves sexual arousal or attraction towards sleeping or unconscious individuals, raising questions about consent, psychology, and the boundaries of human sexuality.

The exploration of somnophilia opens up a fascinating realm of human behavior and psychology. This article delves into the meaning of somnophilia, examines its psychological underpinnings, and discusses various types of somnophilic fantasies. It also sheds light on the prevalence and demographics of somnophilia, addresses ethical and legal concerns, and differentiates between somnophilia and related concepts like dormaphilia. Furthermore, the article explores potential treatment options and management strategies to help individuals better understand and navigate this complex aspect of human sexuality.

What is Somnophilia?

Definition

Somnophilia is a condition characterized by sexual arousal or attraction towards sleeping or unconscious individuals. It is a type of paraphilia, which refers to atypical or uncommon sexual interests, behaviors, or fantasies. The term “somnophilia” is derived from the Latin word “somnus,” meaning sleep, and the Greek word “philia,” meaning love or attraction. It is also known as the “sleeping beauty syndrome.”

Key characteristics

A person with somnophilia may attempt to induce an unconscious state in their partner by using drugs or taking advantage of intoxication or deep sleep. The core aspect of somnophilia is the individual’s arousal stemming from the fact that their sexual partner is unable to resist or oppose their advances due to being unconscious or unresponsive.

Symptoms of somnophilia include frequent thoughts, excessive fantasizing, and overt sexual desire or behavior involving unconscious or unresponsive individuals. The individual may experience intense sexual urges or engage in sexual activities with a partner who is unable to provide consent due to their unconscious state.

Related paraphilias

Somnophilia has been historically linked to necrophilia, which involves sexual arousal or intercourse with corpses. While some psychologists have suggested that somnophilia and necrophilia are separate entities, others believe that somnophilia is a form of necrophilia, as both conditions involve sexual attraction towards non-consenting, unconscious individuals.

Additionally, somnophilia shares similarities with other predatory paraphilias, such as frotteurism (deriving sexual pleasure from rubbing against non-consenting individuals) and voyeurism (deriving sexual pleasure from observing unsuspecting individuals in private situations).

The Psychology Behind Somnophilia

Power and control dynamics

Somnophilia often involves a power dynamic where the individual derives sexual gratification from exerting control over an unconscious or unresponsive partner. This sense of control manifests in various ways, as highlighted by participant responses in studies. Some participants described being able to control their partner’s body and the entire sexual encounter without interaction, as one participant stated, “Somnophilia puts me in charge, and it allows things to be attempted that can’t be done if the other person is awake” (Participant 48). The inability of the unconscious partner to resist or consent to the acts fuels the somnophiliac’s desire for power and control.

Fear of rejection

Another psychological aspect of somnophilia is the fear of rejection. Engaging with an unconscious partner eliminates the possibility of rejection or refusal, which can be appealing to individuals with low self-esteem or social anxiety. As one participant mentioned, they found it appealing “that [he was] being totally trusted” (Participant 33), suggesting a sense of trust and acceptance that may be lacking in conscious interactions.

Desire for intimacy

Paradoxically, some individuals with somnophilia may seek a deeper level of intimacy through their fantasies or actions. While the unconscious state of the partner may seem to contradict intimacy, some participants reported envisioning specific partners, whether current, former, or desired, in their somnophilic fantasies (16.1% of participants). This suggests a desire for a closer connection, albeit through unconventional means.

However, it is crucial to note that 18.8% of participants stated that the passive partner waking up was the biggest barrier to enacting their fantasies, as one participant expressed frustration when “partners sleep too lightly, and/or the over the counter sleeping aids are not strong enough to keep them asleep for the entire time” (Participant 61). This highlights the importance of maintaining the unconscious state for the fulfillment of somnophilic desires.

Furthermore, 12.5% of participants reported not disclosing their somnophilic interests to their partners, often due to concerns about being judged or misunderstood, as one participant stated, “I have not found a way of articulating how much I like this play without sounding creepy” (Participant 55). This fear of societal stigma and misunderstanding can contribute to the psychological complexity surrounding somnophilia.

Types of Somnophilic Fantasies

Consensual scenarios

Somnophilic fantasies can be categorized as consensual or non-consensual. Consensual somnophilia refers to sexual activities that the sleeping partner has previously consented to while awake. This behavior often involves a high level of trust and mutual interest between partners. It is akin to how sadistic and masochistic behaviors require consent, interest, and trust within a relationship. Deehan and Bartels (2021) found that 82% of their sample reported an interest in consensually engaging in sexual activity with a sleeping partner.

Non-consensual scenarios

Non-consensual somnophilia involves sexual activities without the sleeping partner’s prior consent. This category raises ethical and legal concerns as it violates the principles of consent. Deehan and Bartels (2021) reported that 47% of their sample expressed an interest in non-consensual somnophilic activities. Furthermore, they found that a greater rape proclivity (in male participants) and more frequent use of biastophilic fantasies (in female participants) were significant predictors of non-consensual somnophilia.

Some participants explicitly mentioned rape or “consensual non-consent” as sexually appealing aspects of their somnophilic fantasies. Others implied non-consent by stating that the passive partner’s lack of awareness or inability to resist was arousing.

Waking vs. non-waking fantasies

Somnophilic fantasies can also be categorized based on whether the sleeping partner wakes up during the sexual activity or remains asleep throughout. According to Deehan and Bartels (in prep), some individuals find the passive partner waking up during the act arousing, aligning with the “Sleeping Beauty Syndrome” concept. They envision the partner’s surprise or pleasure upon waking.

Conversely, other individuals express frustration when their partners wake up, leading them to use sleeping aids to maintain the unconscious state. For these individuals, the lack of resistance and ability to attempt behaviors otherwise impossible with a conscious partner contribute to the arousal.

Additionally, some participants reported finding the act of watching the passive partner fall asleep as a key element of their fantasy.

Suggestion for read: The Psychology Behind Sex with Older Women

Prevalence and Demographics

Estimated prevalence

Research on the prevalence of somnophilia is limited, partly due to the secretive and stigmatized nature of this paraphilia. Most individuals with somnophilia keep their desires hidden because of the social and legal implications of their fantasies, making it challenging to estimate its prevalence in the general population accurately. However, some studies have attempted to shed light on the potential prevalence of somnophilic interests and behaviors.

A 2015 study with a sample of 1516 participants reported that 22.6% of men and 10.8% of women have fantasized about “sexually abusing a person who is drunk, asleep, or unconscious.” Another 2021 study by Michael Seto found that 9% of its participants have had an interest in “sex with someone who is unconscious or sleeping,” and 7.7% engaged in such behavior.

A third study reported that 82% of its sample have had an interest in engaging in consensual sexual activities with a sleeping partner, and 47% reported some interest in non-consensual somnophilic activities. These studies suggest that somnophilic fantasies may be more common than previously thought, although possible sample biases have been identified in some of them.

Gender differences

The available research indicates potential gender differences in the prevalence of somnophilia. The 2015 study mentioned earlier found that a higher percentage of men (22.6%) reported fantasizing about “sexually abusing a person who is drunk, asleep, or unconscious” compared to women (10.8%).

Furthermore, Deehan and Bartels (2021) found that a greater rape proclivity in male participants and more frequent use of biastophilic fantasies (involving the use of force or coercion) in female participants were significant predictors of non-consensual somnophilia.

Age distribution

Limited data exists on the age distribution of individuals with somnophilia. However, some studies have provided insights into the age range of participants reporting somnophilic interests or behaviors.

In the study by Deehan and Bartels (2021), the final sample (N = 232) consisted of participants aged between 18 and 73 years, with a mean age of 34.5 years. Of these participants, 49.1% identified as having somnophilia, while 50% did not.

Another study by Deehan and Bartels (in prep) found that among participants who reported using somnophilic or dormaphilic (being the recipient of sex while asleep) fantasies, the age range varied from 18 to 73 years, with a mean age of 34.5 years.

While these studies provide some insights into the age distribution of individuals with somnophilia, it is essential to note that the available data is limited, and further research is needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

Ethical and Legal Concerns

Consent issues

The most significant ethical concern surrounding somnophilia is the potential lack of consent. Consent is a fundamental aspect of any healthy sexual relationship, and engaging in sexual activity with someone who is unable to provide informed and enthusiastic consent is morally and legally problematic. Engaging in sexual activity with a person who is asleep or unconscious raises significant consent issues, as the sleeping individual cannot provide consent or actively participate in the act.

While some individuals with somnophilia may claim prior consent from their partner, sexual consent is not a binding contract. A partner could give permission to initiate sexual contact while asleep, but they can also withdraw that permission at any time, either before or during the act. Consent as a legal defense would generally need to be given in the moment and can be revoked at any point. Statements like “They said it was fine the day before” are likely insufficient as a legal defense against sexual assault charges.

Furthermore, the law states that when someone’s capacity is impaired, such as being under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or anesthesia, they cannot provide valid informed consent. A person must be coherent, awake, and fully aware of the situation and potential consequences to give legally recognized consent.

Potential for harm

Engaging in non-consensual somnophilic behavior can potentially cause significant harm to the victim, both physically and psychologically. The lack of awareness and inability to resist or participate in the act can lead to physical injuries, emotional trauma, and a violation of personal autonomy.

Moreover, some studies have found associations between non-consensual somnophilia and other concerning behaviors, such as rape fantasies and rape proclivity. This suggests that individuals with non-consensual somnophilic interests may be at a higher risk of engaging in other predatory or harmful sexual behaviors.

Legal implications

Non-consensual somnophilic behavior can have severe legal consequences, as it constitutes sexual assault or rape in most jurisdictions. Engaging in sexual activity with an unconscious or sleeping individual without their explicit consent can result in criminal charges and potential imprisonment.

In recent times, some individuals have attempted to use the defense of “prior consent” in legal cases involving sexual offenses against sleeping or unconscious victims. However, as discussed earlier, consent is an ongoing process that can be withdrawn at any time, and relying on prior consent as a legal defense is often insufficient.

It is crucial to acknowledge that somnophilic behavior without explicit, ongoing consent from a fully aware and capable partner is not only unethical but also illegal in most regions. Society places a strong emphasis on the importance of consent to protect individuals from sexual exploitation, coercion, and harm.

Somnophilia vs. Dormaphilia

Key differences

Somnophilia, coined by John Money in 1986, generally refers to a sexual interest in engaging in sexual activity with a sleeping person.

On the other hand, dormaphilia, a term introduced by Deehan and Bartels (2021), describes the sexual interest in being the recipient of sexual activity while asleep. While both involve sleep-related sexual interests, they differ in their core focus.

Somnophilia centers around the desire to initiate or perform sexual acts on an unconscious or sleeping partner. The individual derives arousal from the partner’s inability to resist or provide consent due to their unconscious state.

Conversely, dormaphilia involves the desire to be the passive recipient of sexual activity while asleep, without being aware of the encounter.

Overlapping features

Despite their differences, somnophilia and dormaphilia share some overlapping features. Both involve sleep-related sexual interests and fantasies, which are considered atypical or paraphilic in nature. Additionally, both can raise ethical and legal concerns, particularly when non-consensual behavior is involved.

Deehan and Bartels (2021) found that some participants reported using both somnophilic and dormaphilic fantasies, suggesting a potential overlap or co-occurrence of these interests in certain individuals.

Psychological underpinnings

While the psychological underpinnings of somnophilia have been explored to some extent, the motivations behind dormaphilia are less well-understood. However, some insights can be drawn from the available research.

For somnophilia, factors such as a desire for power and control, fear of rejection, and a paradoxical desire for intimacy have been identified as potential psychological drivers. Deehan and Bartels (2021) found that a greater rape proclivity in male participants and more frequent use of biastophilic fantasies (involving the use of force or coercion) in female participants were significant predictors of non-consensual somnophilia, suggesting an underlying interest in non-consensual sex.

Regarding dormaphilia, some participants expressed that the passive partner waking up during the act was a barrier to enacting their fantasies. This suggests that the lack of awareness and inability to resist or consent may be a key aspect of the appeal for certain individuals with dormaphilic interests.

It is important to note that both somnophilia and dormaphilia can involve consensual or non-consensual scenarios. While consensual scenarios may be explored within the boundaries of trust and mutual agreement between partners, non-consensual behavior raises significant ethical and legal concerns, as it violates the principles of consent and personal autonomy.

Treatment and Management

Therapeutic approaches

The treatment of somnophilia is often unnecessary unless the behavior becomes destructive, problematic, or involves sexually criminal activity, leading to legal issues. However, in cases where intervention is deemed necessary, several therapeutic approaches have been proposed, although empirical data on their effectiveness is limited.

1. Psychotherapy: Individual therapy or counseling can help individuals with somnophilia explore the underlying reasons for their interests and behaviors. Therapists can work with patients to identify the origins of their desires, understand the potential consequences, and develop healthier coping mechanisms.
2. Behavioral therapy: Techniques such as aversion therapy, orgasmic reconditioning, or systematic desensitization may be employed to modify the individual’s arousal patterns and redirect their sexual interests towards more socially acceptable outlets.
3. Hypnotherapy: While controversial and considered a last resort, some speculate that hypnosis could potentially help individuals with somnophilia gain control over their urges and behaviors, provided it is conducted by a credible and registered expert.
4. Group therapy: Participating in support groups or group therapy sessions can provide a non-judgmental environment for individuals with somnophilia to share their experiences, learn from others, and receive peer support.

Coping strategies

For individuals seeking to manage their somnophilic interests without professional intervention, various coping strategies may be helpful:

1. Self-awareness and self-monitoring: Developing a better understanding of one’s triggers, fantasies, and behaviors can aid in recognizing and controlling urges before they escalate.
2. Cognitive-behavioral techniques: Techniques such as thought-stopping, cognitive restructuring, and mindfulness practices can help individuals redirect their thoughts and behaviors towards more positive outlets.
3. Healthy relationships and communication: Building open and honest communication with a consenting partner can create a safe environment for exploring consensual, sleep-related fantasies within the boundaries of trust and mutual agreement.
4. Seeking support: Connecting with online communities or support groups can provide a sense of belonging and understanding, while also offering resources and coping strategies from others navigating similar experiences.

Support resources

While resources specifically tailored to somnophilia are limited, individuals seeking support or information can explore the following:

1. Mental health professionals: Consulting with licensed therapists, counselors, or sex therapists who specialize in paraphilias or atypical sexual interests can provide personalized guidance and support.
2. Online resources and forums: Reputable online forums and support groups can offer a sense of community, shared experiences, and access to educational materials and resources.
3. Advocacy organizations: Organizations dedicated to promoting sexual health, consent, and ethical practices may provide resources or referrals for individuals seeking support or information about somnophilia.

It is important to note that while some therapeutic approaches and coping strategies may be helpful, engaging in non-consensual somnophilic behavior can have severe legal consequences and should be avoided at all costs.

Conclusion

Somnophilia presents a complex and controversial aspect of human sexuality, encompassing a range of psychological motivations and ethical considerations. The exploration of this paraphilia sheds light on the intricate interplay between power dynamics, intimacy, and consent in sexual relationships. While consensual somnophilic activities may be explored within trusting partnerships, it’s crucial to understand the legal and ethical implications of non-consensual behavior.

Navigating the complexities of somnophilia and other atypical sexual interests can be challenging, but support is available. At Inquire Talk, we’re committed to providing online counseling and therapy services to individuals seeking support and emotional well-being. Understanding and managing one’s sexual desires, especially those that may be considered unconventional or potentially harmful, is vital to maintain healthy relationships and personal well-being. By fostering open dialog, promoting education, and encouraging professional support when needed, we can work towards a more comprehensive understanding of human sexuality in all its diverse forms.

FAQs

What does the term “Sleeping Beauty syndrome” in relation to somnophilia mean?
In 1972, psychologists Victor Calef and Edward Weinshel coined the term “Sleeping Beauty syndrome,” which is sometimes used interchangeably with somnophilia. It primarily describes a scenario where an individual’s arousal is dependent on or heightened by the act of the sleeping person awakening during sexual contact.

What causes somnophilia?
Somnophilia is characterized by sexual arousal stemming from a partner’s unconsciousness. Individuals with this condition may fetishize the notion of taking advantage of someone who is in a vulnerable, unconscious state.

Can somnophilia be considered an assault?
According to researcher Money, somnophilia has historically shown a high correlation with incestuous acts. It may involve abusive behaviors, including the use of force or abduction, and typically targets strangers rather than individuals known intimately by the perpetrator.

How does somnophilia differ from necrophilia?
While both somnophilia and necrophilia involve attraction to individuals who cannot resist advances, somnophilia involves arousal from a sleeping or unconscious person. In contrast, necrophilia involves a sexual attraction to corpses. Somnophilia may also overlap with other paraphilias, such as biastophilia, which is an attraction to the idea of rape.

Here are few certified therapists who you can get in touch and book a therapy session with:

Simi Valecha Johnson

Sharan Thiara

Lynda Pabari