8 Characteristics of Queerplatonic Relationships: A Deep Dive

In today’s society, where traditional relationship structures are being challenged and reimagined, the concept of queerplatonic relationships has emerged as a unique and meaningful dynamic. A queerplatonic relation represents a deep, committed bond between individuals that transcends the boundaries of conventional friendship while remaining distinctly non-romantic. It offers an alternative to the heteronormative expectations surrounding emotional intimacy and commitment.

This comprehensive article delves into the nuances of queerplatonic relationships, exploring their essence, history, and the diverse ways in which they manifest across gender identities and sexual orientations. We will examine the characteristics that define these connections, the societal perceptions surrounding them, and the terminology used to articulate their complexities, such as “queerplatonic attraction,” “queerplatonic crush,” and “queerplatonic partnership.” By understanding the intricacies of these bonds, we aim to shed light on a lesser-known yet profoundly significant aspect of human connection.

What are Queerplatonic Relationships?

Queerplatonic relationships, often abbreviated as QPRs or QPPs (queerplatonic partnerships), are committed, intimate relationships between individuals that go beyond conventional friendship but are distinctly non-romantic in nature. These relationships involve a deep emotional connection, commitment, and prioritization typically associated with romantic partnerships, without the romantic element.

Definition and Core Characteristics

A queerplatonic relations can be defined as a close, non-inherently sexual, non-romantic relationship that transcends what most would consider a friendship. It consists of emotional commitment, prioritization, and a level of intimacy that is usually seen in romantic relationships, but without the romantic aspect. People in queerplatonic relationships can be of any gender or sexual identity.

The core characteristics of a queerplatonic relationship include:

1. Deep emotional intimacy and closeness
2. Mutual trust and loyalty
3. Commitment and prioritization of the relationship
4. Non-romantic and non-sexual in nature
5. Challenging traditional relationship norms and structures

Relationship Dynamics and Structures

Queerplatonic relationships challenge Western culture’s understanding of monogamous and committed relationships. They offer an alternative to heteronormative relationships and the assumption that everyone desires romantic and/or sexual connections. These relationships can involve two or more individuals of any gender identity.

The dynamics and structures of queerplatonic relationships can vary greatly. Some queerplatonic partners may live together, platonically marry, co-parent, or even have children together, while others may maintain separate living arrangements. The level of physical intimacy, such as platonic physical affection or literally sleeping together, is determined by the individuals involved.

Queerplatonic relation structures tend to be non-exclusive, but they can follow any model that feels right for the individuals involved. The amount of mutual intimacy, commitment, and prioritization is also determined by the partners themselves.

Significance for Asexual and Aromantic Communities

While queerplatonic relationships are not limited to any specific community, they hold particular significance for individuals who identify as asexual (ace) or aromantic (aro). Asexual individuals may not experience sexual attraction, while aromantic individuals may not experience romantic attraction.

For these individuals, queerplatonic relationships can provide a way to fulfill their desire for emotional intimacy and commitment without compromising their identities. By naming their significant relationships as queerplatonic, they can avoid using terms that imply a sexual or romantic connection, which may not align with their experiences.

History and Evolution of Queerplatonic Relationships

The term “queerplatonic” was coined in 2010 by the writers s.e. cummings and Kaz, originating within the aromantic and asexual communities. Initially, its usage was largely restricted to these spaces throughout the 2010s.

Romantic Friendship

The concept of queerplatonic relationships draws inspiration from the historical practice of “Boston marriages” – formalized romantic friendships between wealthy women in late 19th century New England. These unions, while not sexual or romantic in nature, allowed women to cohabit and share a deep emotional bond, challenging societal norms of the time. Relationships akin to queerplatonic partnerships can be traced back even further, with some scholars suggesting that the biblical figures Ruth and Naomi may have had one of the earliest recorded examples.

College Culture

As the term gained traction, it found resonance within college communities, particularly among millennials and Generation Z. Young people began exploring and embracing queerplatonic relationships as an alternative to traditional romantic dynamics, customizing their commitments according to their desires and needs.

Modern Developments

From 2021 onwards, the concept of queerplatonic relationships started gaining mainstream recognition, with popular websites aimed at general audiences discussing and exploring the topic. Academic circles have also begun incorporating the term in art and literature criticism, acknowledging its significance in understanding diverse relationship dynamics.

Moreover, queerplatonic relationships have become associated with the polyamorous community and the broader principles of relationship anarchy. Individuals involved in consensual non-monogamous relationships often adopt a “complex” vocabulary, including terms like “queerplatonic,” to articulate the nuances of their connections. The shared philosophy of customizing commitments according to personal desires has drawn parallels between queerplatonic life partnerships and polyamory.

Characteristics of Queerplatonic Relationships

Emotional Commitment

Queerplatonic relationships are characterized by a deep emotional commitment that transcends traditional friendship boundaries. Partners in these relationships prioritize each other and make conscious efforts to nurture their bond. This emotional intimacy mirrors the level of commitment typically seen in romantic relationships, without the romantic element.

The emotional commitment in queerplatonic relationships manifests through mutual trust, loyalty, and a willingness to be a constant source of support. Partners share a profound understanding of each other’s needs, aspirations, and vulnerabilities, creating a safe space for emotional vulnerability and growth.

Intimacy without Romance

While queerplatonic relationships involve a high degree of emotional intimacy, they are distinctly non-romantic in nature. The intimacy shared between partners is not rooted in romantic attraction or desire but rather in a deep, platonic connection that defies conventional relationship norms.

This intimacy can take various forms, such as physical affection (e.g., cuddling, holding hands, or sharing a bed), emotional vulnerability, and a deep sense of trust and understanding. However, the absence of romantic feelings or sexual attraction sets queerplatonic relationships apart from traditional romantic partnerships.

Non-Exclusive Structures

Queerplatonic relationships often embrace non-exclusive structures, allowing partners to have multiple queerplatonic connections or engage in other romantic or sexual relationships simultaneously. This non-exclusivity challenges traditional monogamous relationship models and provides individuals with the freedom to explore and define their connections on their own terms.

The level of intimacy, commitment, and prioritization within each queerplatonic relationship is determined by the individuals involved, allowing for a diverse range of relationship dynamics and structures. Some partners may choose to cohabit, co-parent, or even engage in platonic marriages, while others maintain separate living arrangements.

The non-exclusive nature of queerplatonic relationships promotes autonomy, self-exploration, and the celebration of diverse forms of love and connection.

How Different Genders and Identities Engage in Queerplatonic Relationships

Queerplatonic relationships are not limited to any specific gender identity or sexual orientation. While they hold particular significance for asexual and aromantic individuals, people across the gender and sexuality spectrum can engage in and find meaning through these connections.

Participation of Asexual Individuals

For individuals who identify as asexual (ace), queerplatonic relationships offer a way to fulfill their desire for emotional intimacy and commitment without the expectation of sexual attraction or activity. By naming their significant relationships as queerplatonic, asexual individuals can avoid using terms that imply a sexual connection, which may not align with their experiences.

Many asexual individuals value the freedom to explore different forms of intimacy within queerplatonic relationships, such as physical affection, emotional vulnerability, and deep emotional bonds, without the pressure of sexual intimacy. These relationships allow them to customize their commitments and connections according to their individual needs and desires.

Suggestion for read: 12 Reasons Behind Growing Trend of Voluntary Celibacy

Involvement of Aromantic Individuals

Aromantic individuals, who may not experience romantic attraction, often find queerplatonic relationships particularly appealing. These connections provide a framework for deep emotional intimacy and commitment without the romantic element typically associated with traditional partnerships.

For aromantic individuals, queerplatonic relationships offer a way to engage in meaningful, committed relationships without the expectations or societal pressures associated with romantic partnerships. They can prioritize their emotional connections and build lasting bonds without compromising their identities or experiences.

Broader LGBTQ+ Community

While queerplatonic relationships hold specific significance for asexual and aromantic individuals, they are not limited to these communities. Individuals across the LGBTQ+ spectrum, as well as those who identify as heterosexual or cisgender, can engage in and find value in queerplatonic connections.

Within the broader LGBTQ+ community, queerplatonic relationships can provide a space for individuals to explore and define their connections on their own terms, challenging traditional relationship norms and structures. These relationships offer a way to celebrate diverse forms of love, intimacy, and commitment, transcending the boundaries of conventional romantic or platonic relationships.

Queerplatonic relationships are open to individuals of any gender identity, sexual orientation, or relationship status. They provide a framework for building meaningful, committed connections that align with each person’s unique needs, desires, and experiences, regardless of their specific identities or orientations.

Community and Social Dynamics

Queerplatonic relationships have played a significant role within various communities, challenging traditional norms and fostering support networks. Here are some key aspects of the community and social dynamics surrounding these connections:

Role in LGBTQ+ Community

Queerplatonic relationships hold particular significance for individuals within the LGBTQ+ community, especially those who identify as asexual or aromantic. For these individuals, queerplatonic relationships provide a framework to explore and fulfill their desires for emotional intimacy and commitment without the expectations or pressures associated with romantic partnerships.

Within the broader LGBTQ+ community, queerplatonic relationships offer a space to celebrate diverse forms of love, intimacy, and commitment, transcending the boundaries of conventional romantic or platonic relationships. They challenge heteronormative assumptions and provide a platform for individuals to define their connections on their own terms.

Challenging Traditional Relationship Norms

The concept of queerplatonic relationships challenges traditional Western cultural norms surrounding monogamous, committed relationships. They offer an alternative to the assumption that everyone desires romantic and/or sexual connections, and they question the rigid categorization of relationships as either romantic or platonic.

By embracing non-exclusive structures and customizing their commitments according to individual needs and desires, queerplatonic relationships defy societal expectations and norms. They promote autonomy, self-exploration, and the celebration of diverse forms of love and connection, ultimately expanding the understanding of what constitutes a meaningful and fulfilling relationship.

Support Networks

Queerplatonic relationships have fostered the development of supportive communities and networks, particularly within the asexual and aromantic spheres. These communities provide a safe space for individuals to share their experiences, seek guidance, and connect with others who understand the nuances of queerplatonic connections.

Online forums, social media groups, and in-person meetups have played a crucial role in facilitating these support networks. They offer a platform for individuals to exchange insights, discuss challenges, and celebrate the unique aspects of their queerplatonic relationships, fostering a sense of belonging and validation.

Moreover, these support networks have contributed to raising awareness and promoting understanding of queerplatonic relationships within the broader society.

Through open dialogues, educational efforts, and shared narratives, they aim to challenge stigma and misconceptions, advocating for the recognition and acceptance of these diverse relationship dynamics.

Terms and Definitions

The queerplatonic community has developed a specialized vocabulary to articulate the nuances of these relationships. Here are some key terms and definitions:

Zucchini

“Zucchini” is a colloquial term used to refer to an individual’s partner in a queerplatonic relationship. The term was coined by Dreamwidth user meloukhia on December 25, 2010, in response to a post about aromanticism. It became more widely known after a WordPress user, Sciatrix, posted their thoughts on the term in 2011.

The commitment level between those in a queerplatonic relationship is considered to exceed a platonic friendship but not conform to traditional ideas regarding a romantic relationship. Zucchinis can be of any romantic or sexual orientation.

Marshmallow and Mallowfriend

“Mallowfriend” is an alternative term to “zucchini” and “queerplatonic partner” (QPP). It is a portmanteau of “marshmallow” and “friend,” meant to convey the warmth and closeness of a queerplatonic bond.

Squish

A “squish” is the platonic equivalent of a crush. It refers to intense feelings of admiration, affection, and desire for emotional intimacy with someone, without any romantic or sexual undertones. The term “squashfriend” is sometimes used interchangeably, although it is less common.

Individuals in queerplatonic relationships may experience squishes on their partners, similar to how people in romantic relationships might develop crushes. For example, someone might say, “I might have gone and gotten a squish on someone I’m probably not gonna see again.”

The experience of a squish can vary in intensity and duration. Some may be short-lived, while others can persist for years, potentially evolving into a queerplatonic relationship or remaining a strong platonic attraction.

Public Perception and Media Representation

The public perception and media representation of queerplatonic relationships have evolved over time, reflecting societal attitudes and understanding of these unique connections. As the concept gains more visibility, it faces both challenges and opportunities in terms of acceptance and accurate portrayal.

Representation in Media

Queerplatonic relationships have been gradually gaining representation in various media forms, including literature, films, and television shows. However, their depiction is often subtle or open to interpretation, as the nuances of these relationships are not always explicitly addressed or labeled as such.

In some cases, characters may exhibit traits or dynamics that could be interpreted as queerplatonic, such as deep emotional bonds, prioritization of each other, and a level of commitment typically associated with romantic partnerships, without the romantic or sexual elements. Examples of such potential queerplatonic relationships can be found in works like “Sherlock” (the dynamic between Sherlock and Watson), “Doctor Who” (the relationship between the Doctor and the Master), and “Warehouse 13” (the bond between Pete and Myka).

While these representations may resonate with individuals in queerplatonic relationships, the lack of explicit acknowledgment or labeling can lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation. Additionally, some works may initially portray queerplatonic dynamics only to later conform to heteronormative expectations by introducing romantic elements, potentially undermining the authenticity of the representation.

Perceptions and Discrimination

Despite growing awareness, queerplatonic relationships still face challenges in terms of public perception and understanding. Many individuals may struggle to comprehend the concept of a committed, intimate relationship that falls outside the traditional romantic or platonic dichotomy.

Misconceptions and stigma surrounding queerplatonic relationships can stem from various sources, including:

1. Societal norms and expectations: Western cultures often emphasize romantic relationships as the pinnacle of emotional commitment, leading to a lack of understanding or acceptance of alternative relationship structures.
2. Lack of representation and visibility: Limited media representation and public discourse around queerplatonic relationships contribute to a lack of awareness and understanding.
3. Prejudice and discrimination: Individuals in queerplatonic relationships may face discrimination, prejudice, or dismissal of their connections, particularly from those who hold traditional or conservative views on relationships.

These perceptions and attitudes can have a significant impact on individuals in queerplatonic relationships, potentially leading to feelings of isolation, invalidation, or the need to constantly explain and defend their connections.

Examples from Literature and Film

While explicit representations of queerplatonic relationships in mainstream media are still relatively rare, some works have explored dynamics that could be interpreted as queerplatonic:

1. “Boston Marriage” by David Mamet: This play examines the concept of “Boston marriages,” historical romantic friendships between women in the late 19th century, which some scholars have likened to queerplatonic relationships.
2. “Tipping the Velvet” by Sarah Waters: This novel features a deep, committed relationship between two women that transcends traditional boundaries, potentially reflecting queerplatonic elements.
3. “The Lord of the Rings” by J.R.R. Tolkien: The bond between Frodo and Sam has been interpreted by some as a potential example of a queerplatonic relationship, characterized by deep emotional intimacy and commitment without romantic undertones.
4. “Blue Drop” (anime): The relationship between Mari Wakatake and Hagino Senkouji has been discussed as a potential queerplatonic dynamic, despite the characters being portrayed as a couple in the end.

These examples, while not explicitly labeled as queerplatonic, offer glimpses into the complexities of relationships that defy traditional categorizations, potentially resonating with individuals who identify with queerplatonic connections.

Controversies and Challenges

Identity Debates

Queerplatonic relationships have sparked debates within various communities regarding their identity and categorization. Some individuals argue that queerplatonic relationships should be considered an orientation in themselves, with prefixes like “homo-queerplatonic” or “pan-queerplatonic” to indicate the gender(s) one desires queerplatonic connections with. However, others contend that queerplatonic relationships are a relationship type or structure, not an orientation, as individuals of any romantic or sexual orientation can potentially engage in queerplatonic relationships.

There have also been discussions around the distinction between “queerplatonic” and “quasiplatonic” relationships. While queerplatonic relationships are defined as non-romantic and entirely platonic, some argue that quasiplatonic relationships may involve a non-platonic component, such as alterous or grayromantic attraction. This distinction has led to debates about whether queerplatonic relationships truly fall under the platonic umbrella or if they inherently involve some level of non-platonic attraction.

Media Misrepresentation

Queerplatonic relationships have faced challenges in terms of accurate representation in media. While some works have explored dynamics that could be interpreted as queerplatonic, explicit representations are still relatively rare in mainstream media. When portrayed, queerplatonic relationships are often subtle or open to interpretation, leading to ambiguity and potential misunderstanding.

Additionally, some works may initially depict queerplatonic dynamics but later conform to heteronormative expectations by introducing romantic elements, potentially undermining the authenticity of the representation. This lack of explicit acknowledgment or labeling can contribute to the erasure of queerplatonic relationships and their unique nuances.

Social Acceptance

Despite growing awareness, queerplatonic relationships still face challenges in terms of public perception and understanding. Many individuals may struggle to comprehend the concept of a committed, intimate relationship that falls outside the traditional romantic or platonic dichotomy. Misconceptions and stigma can stem from societal norms, lack of representation, and prejudice against non-traditional relationship structures.

Individuals in queerplatonic relationships may face discrimination, prejudice, or dismissal of their connections, particularly from those who hold traditional or conservative views on relationships. These perceptions and attitudes can lead to feelings of isolation, invalidation, or the need to constantly explain and defend their connections.

Moreover, the limited understanding of queerplatonic relationships within society can create challenges for those involved in navigating their relationships and finding acceptance and support from their social circles and communities.

Conclusion

The concept of queerplatonic relationships challenges traditional Western cultural norms surrounding relationships and offers a unique perspective on emotional intimacy and commitment. These connections transcend the dichotomy of romantic and platonic bonds, providing a framework for individuals to explore diverse forms of love, prioritization, and mutual understanding. As society’s awareness and acceptance of queerplatonic relationships continue to grow, it is crucial to embrace and celebrate the diversity of human connections.

While navigating the complexities of any relationship can be challenging, seeking support can provide invaluable guidance and validation. Consider exploring the online counseling services offered by Inquire Talk, where licensed therapists specialize in addressing various relational dynamics, including queerplatonic connections. By prioritizing your emotional well-being, you can embark on a journey of self-discovery and embracing the authentic connections that resonate with your unique needs and desires.

FAQs

1. How would you describe a queerplatonic relationship (QPR)?A queerplatonic relationship (QPR) is a unique bond that lies somewhere between friendship and romance. It involves individuals who may not experience romantic attraction towards each other but share a connection that surpasses traditional friendship expectations.
2. What activities do partners in queerplatonic relationships engage in?Partners in queerplatonic relationships, also known as queerplatonic partnerships (QPPs), engage in deeply committed, non-romantic relationships. These partnerships can vary greatly and may include sharing finances, co-parenting, or even entering into legal agreements together, reflecting a deeper commitment than typical friendships.
3. Is kissing allowed in queerplatonic relationships?Yes, kissing can occur in queerplatonic relationships. Although these relationships are platonic and not sexual in nature, they can include physical expressions of affection such as kissing, depending on the boundaries set by the individuals involved.
4. Is it possible to date someone else while in a queerplatonic relationship?Yes, individuals in queerplatonic relationships can also pursue romantic or sexual relationships with others. Queerplatonic relationships are not inherently exclusive, allowing for flexibility in forming additional emotional or romantic connections outside the queerplatonic partnership.

Inquire Talk certified therapists who you can get in touch and book a therapy session with:

Paul

Vicky Rebecca

Georgina Lynch